Player-Controlled Resource Values [In The Lab]

Um, yay?
I'm noodling a little mechanic in my head and I'm not sure how well it works in actual play yet. And of course I don't have the time to really experiment with it at the moment. I'm posting it here so you can give it a shot. Like some of my previous thought-experiments, let's use a stock market theme for the time being.

Each player begins the game with ten chips, a personal "Portfolio" board and a pair of dice. The players share a "Market" board and a general supply of chips from the bank.

Both the Portfolio and Market boards show dice results 1-6. These represent six different stocks. The Portfolio board is where you keep track of how many shares you own in those stocks. The Market board keeps track of the value of each share in that stock.

The Market board
An example of a Portfolio board, with three shares in [1], one share in [3], one share in [5], and two shares in [6].


On the first turn, roll the dice first. The two results show stocks available for manipulation this turn. You may buy, sell or pass either of the results.
  • Buy: Check the value of your chosen stock on the Market board. Pay that many chips for one share. At the end of your turn, the value of that stock rises by one increment.
  • Sell: Check the value of your chosen stock on the Market board. Get that many chips per share you wish to sell. At the end of your turn, the value of that stock lowers by one increment.
  • Pass: You do not buy or sell this stock.
If you roll a double, you may buy then sell, buy then pass, or sell then pass. You may also buy twice or sell twice. If you buy twice, the value of that stock doubles. If you sell twice, the value halves, rounded down.

At the end of your turn, roll the dice again. For the rest of the game, all the players roll their dice at the end of their turn. These will be the stocks you can manipulate on your next turn. These are public so everyone can see what you might be planning later in the game.

The game ends when one player collects at least one share in each stock. The player with the highest value portfolio wins.

I'm sure mathy folks can figure out how well this system works, but I am very fascinated by the idea of players affecting resource values throughout the game.

Comments

  1. Seth Ben-EzraMay 20, 2012 at 3:40 PM

    Have you played Power Grid or Buy Low Sell High? Because both games incorporate a similar mechanic....

    ReplyDelete
  2. DanielSolisMay 20, 2012 at 5:02 PM

    Ooh. I haven't, please elaborate?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Seth Ben-EzraMay 20, 2012 at 8:15 PM

    Okay, I'll give it a go....

    Check out this image of the Power Grid board: http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/532332/power-grid?size=original

    (I know, it's big.)

    At the bottom, there's a track with different resources on it. That's the resource market. You buy coal, oil, and such to fuel your power plants, which then send electricity to cities where you have contracts, in order to make money, that you then invest in your grid. That's the basic cycle of the game.

    Resources are placed in those boxes (http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/1272724/power-grid), and the cost of those resources is equal to the number on the box. So, as resources are bought, the cost of that resource naturally increases. At the end of each turn, some resources are replaced, but supply and demand will set the cost level of each resource as the game progresses.

    Check out this review for some more details and pictures: http://www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/468785/power-grid-is-a-must-have-for-all-serious-gamers

    Buy Low Sell High works in a similar manner, except that you're playing cards to influence the values of three different types of stocks (http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/977046/buy-low-sell-high?size=large), but the supply and demand mechanic is in play here as well.

    Wealth of Nations implements a resource market system similar to Power Grid, but I hates that game, yes, precious, hates it. Therefore, I won't talk about it. :-)

    Did that answer your question?

    ReplyDelete
  4. mitchwMay 20, 2012 at 9:22 PM

    "The game ends when one player collects at least one share in each stock."

    If a non-winning player never buys that last stock, the game will never end.

    ReplyDelete
  5. DanielSolisMay 20, 2012 at 9:51 PM

    Oh yeah, true. Definitely needs another endgame condition.

    ReplyDelete
  6. DanielSolisMay 20, 2012 at 9:52 PM

    Excellent! Yes, thanks so much. :D

    ReplyDelete
  7. T.W.WombatMay 21, 2012 at 8:57 AM

    Modern Art has a similar mechanic as well, but the game centers around collecting paintings. "Suits" are artists, and the base value changes based on how many paintings by that artist have come up for auction before. There's also a bidding mechanic and a random element in hidden "value add" cards attached to each painting which get scored at endgame.

    I haven't played in years, and that's off the top of my head, but it's the first thing I thought.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results that ar
Read more

The Thousand-Year Game Design Challenge

Image
UPDATE: The submission period has closed and here are the entries. If you're an entrant, continue sending pics or vids of people playing your game. The first step to a game lasting a thousand years is for people to play it today. UPDATE 2: And here's the winner! To support games designed for longevity – that can be learned, played and shared for hundreds of years – we offer this challenge to any game designers, artists and imaginative people who also share this desire. Challenge Create a game. The game can be of any theme or genre you desire, but there is one restriction: You're creating a "new classic," like Chess, Tag or card games. So, create a game to be enjoyed by generations of players for a thousand years. Prize $1,000 to the winning entrant, to be announced and awarded January 1, 2012. Entry Deadline Entries must be submitted before midnight July August 31st, 2011. ( Update ) Entry Guidelines Enter by posting a comment below with a link
Read more