Feedback Loops in Game Design [Infographic]

Feedback Loops in Game Design

FULL TEXT:

FEEDBACK LOOPS IN GAME DESIGN
as observed by Jesse Catron, Jay Barnson, Kyoryu

Design: Daniel Solis (danielsolis.com)

In a feedback loop, the output affects the input.

POSITIVE FEEDBACK AMPLIFIES the output and tends to destabilize the system. For example, the runaway leader. One player takes an early insurmountable lead.

In Settlers of Catan, the player with the most productive settlements will generate the most resources, which enables him to build more settlements and gain even more resources.

NEGATIVE FEEDBACK DIMINISHES the output and tends to stabilize the system. For example, a “take-that” mechanic that gives trailing player’s more opportunities to constrain the leading player’s efforts.

In Settlers of Catan, players are less likely to accept trades with the leading player. The leading player is more likely to be targeted by the Robber.

Balancing feedback loops is an important skill for all game designers.

DECK BUILDING

[ + ] You can use low value “copper” cards to buy higher value “silver” and “gold” cards, thus leading to greater and greater amounts of buying power later in the game.

[ - ] Victory is determined by collecting Victory Point cards, which have no short-term tactical value and simply take up space in your deck.

RACING / KING OF THE HILL

[ + ] Once a driver takes an early lead, they can shift to high gear to increase speed. While the trailing drivers jockey for more optimal position, the leader has few obstacles.

[ - ] Curves and hazards can make speeding dangerous, allowing trailing drivers to catch up. If cars have weapons, this makes the leader a likely target.

KNIZIA SET

[ + ] Players collect several different types of resources. Each resource has unique properties. Some of which may buy upgrades that make acquiring resources easier.

[ - ] Victory is determined by collecting the most full sets of all resources. Focus is spread across a broad spectrum of tactical decisions.

SOURCES
hyperbolegames.com/2012/05/11/game-design-gone-loopy/
rampantgames.com/blog/2009/08/game-design-positive-and-ne...
www.design.wrong.net/?p=14

“Refresh” symbol by Joris Hoogendoorn, from The Noun Project
“Flag” symbol by Brad Hollander, from The Noun Project

Released under a Creative Commons - Attribution license

Comments

  1. Games & GrubMay 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM

    Is there a feedback loop that can be employed in dice-centric games, since they have increased randomness? Is it primarily dependent on the other elements that interact with the dice?

    ReplyDelete
  2. DanielSolisMay 17, 2012 at 12:35 PM

    Oh, sure. Dice are definitely random, so most feedback loops in dice games try to mitigate that randomness by making past rolls affect the probabilities of future rolls. This is most often done via resource acquisition (+1 for each gold you spend this turn), permanent modifiers (+1 against all strength-related challenges), or temporary conditions (+1 while standing on this space).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dennis CrenshawMay 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM

    This is really cool! Especially so because I'm trying to design a fresh take on Dominion for kicks, and the deck-building balance helps me feel confident I have a firm grasp on the overall shape of the game-flow.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dennis CrenshawMay 17, 2012 at 1:50 PM

    A good example might be Zombie Dice. The more times you roll, the more you keep. The more you keep, the more dice you have to grab out of the bag. Those new dice have an increasing probability of being more dangerous dice.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dennis CrenshawMay 17, 2012 at 1:50 PM

    A good example might be Zombie Dice. The more times you roll, the more you keep. The more you keep, the more dice you have to grab out of the bag. Those new dice have an increasing probability of being more dangerous dice.

    ReplyDelete
  6. DanielSolisMay 17, 2012 at 3:04 PM

    Tracking the potential relationships across a whole card deck is quite a challenge, but so satisfying when you can make it work. :D

    ReplyDelete
  7. Paul TevisMay 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM

    One thing I've noticed in a lot of systems thinking/dynamics literature is to label these as "reinforcing loops" and "balancing loops" rather than positive and negative feedback loops. Why? Because sometimes "positive" feedback loops have undesirable consequences, as you point out. Donella Meadows' THINKING IN SYSTEMS is a great introduction to this topic.

    ReplyDelete
  8. DanielSolisMay 17, 2012 at 5:37 PM

    Oooh. Thanks for the tip! Part of the reason I made this graphic was because I learn better by communicating abstract concepts visually. Do you think a visual learner would pick up on THINKING IN SYSTEMS well?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Julian PritchardMay 18, 2012 at 7:48 AM

    I really liked this piece, although a runaway leader will often single be 'ganked' by the rest of the players.

    In a rather humorous event I wrote an article on loopholes in game design. It has a slight bit of overlap with some of the concepts if you are interested ( http://devmag.org.za/2012/05/07/loopholes-in-game-design/ )

    ReplyDelete
  10. DanielSolisMay 18, 2012 at 10:18 AM

    Wow, that is a great article! Thanks for the link. :D

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results that ar
Read more

The Thousand-Year Game Design Challenge

Image
UPDATE: The submission period has closed and here are the entries. If you're an entrant, continue sending pics or vids of people playing your game. The first step to a game lasting a thousand years is for people to play it today. UPDATE 2: And here's the winner! To support games designed for longevity – that can be learned, played and shared for hundreds of years – we offer this challenge to any game designers, artists and imaginative people who also share this desire. Challenge Create a game. The game can be of any theme or genre you desire, but there is one restriction: You're creating a "new classic," like Chess, Tag or card games. So, create a game to be enjoyed by generations of players for a thousand years. Prize $1,000 to the winning entrant, to be announced and awarded January 1, 2012. Entry Deadline Entries must be submitted before midnight July August 31st, 2011. ( Update ) Entry Guidelines Enter by posting a comment below with a link
Read more