Belle of the Ball - Deconstructing a Card Deck


You saw my previous posts on organic distribution of information across card decks, right? Well, I took a slightly lazier route for Belle of the Ball, using a variety of online text and list tools.

I knew there would be 96 basic guest cards, so I generated a list of numbers 1 through 96. I copied-pasted that list into separate text blocks for each variable of information: Family, Gender, Social Activity, Physical Activity, Popularity Points, and optional power.

In each block, I divided the list into a number of columns equal to the sub-categories within each variable. For example, because Family has six sub-categories, that text block is divided into six columns.

Then I randomized the list within each text block. For ease of reference, I sequentially re-ordered the numbers within each column, too.

The next step is actually formatting the cards according to the information listed in the chart. Start with card 1, and check off 1 from each chart as I add that relevant information to that card. Continue for the other guest cards. This way, I know for sure that I'm not missing any particular sub-category.

In the case of invitation powers, you can see how flexible this system is for generating rare, strong game effects or common, weak game effects. Most of those powers simply allow players to follow-suit, a relatively neutral game effect. Slightly rarer are the powers that allow players to steal cards from each other's hand. And still rarer are powers that let players draw cards from the decks.

So anyway, that's the deck as it stands now. I'm looking for a social activity that is mutually exclusive to Flirt and Snub. I'm leaning towards Gossip. I'm also looking for a physical activity that is mutually exclusive to Eat, Drink and Dance. I'm leaning towards Duels. Any ideas?

[UPDATE: In the original randomization, it turned out ALL the flirters were men. While I want to keep the distribution somewhat organic, this where I'm making a conscious choice to keep things gender-balanced. So, I re-randomized the male and female numbers separately, making sure that flirt, snub, gossip, eat, drink, dance and quarrel were each split evenly between male and female. This is reflected in the chart you see above.

Oh! I settled on "Quarrel" and "Chat."]

[UPDATE 2: Also noticed an error in the point-value distribution. I noticed 55 appeared twice. I re-randomized just to be on the safe side. So, with all that settled, I've got all the cards in a spreadsheet now!]

[UPDATE 3: And now after playtesting, there are way too many game effects. I'll halve that, at least.]

Comments

  1. Zach DonovanMarch 15, 2012 at 11:58 AM

    Social Verb: Question. To question someone, earnestly, is never flirting, and you're certainly not ignoring them either.

    I'm still mulling the physical. Duel is neat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. LeslieMarch 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM

    Perhaps gossip, as a social verb, to gain acceptance with the immediate audience, perhaps at the expense of the speaker's relationship with her subject?
    A physical verb? Perform (a piano piece? a recitation)? Stroll?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kit La ToucheMarch 15, 2012 at 2:52 PM

    Duels are certainly heavily part of the genre, and don't have to be fatal! There's a threat of duel in Pride and Prejudice, and there's an actual (off-screen) duel in Sense and Sensibility in which both Col. Brandon and Willoughby come away unscathed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. DanielSolisMarch 15, 2012 at 2:57 PM

    Are those duels fought with swords or pistols?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kit La ToucheMarch 15, 2012 at 3:03 PM

    The duel in P&P doesn't actually happen, but the fact that the one in S&S ends with both combatants unharmed heavily implies it was a duel with pistols. Brandon doesn't say much about it besides "we met by appointment, he to defend, I to punish his conduct".

    Austen never sets her works in specific dates, and it can be hard to place them as any time other than "while Britain was fighting Boney", but duels were shifting to primarily affairs with pistols around the turn of the century.

    ReplyDelete
  6. wobblesMarch 15, 2012 at 4:29 PM

    Duels seem a little confusing with the setting. I'd expect a duel to actually involve a fight between characters, not being able to attract a mate through a shared love of duels.

    I like Gossip for the social activity, but for the physical activity I'd go for Wallflower. The use of the term might be a little anachronistic, but it feels like a strong alternative to the others and easily "grokable".

    One of the things I'm still not sure of with Wabi-Sabi design is the ability to create good "mechaniphors" or "top down designs" to steal a term from Mark Rosewater. For example, card number 6 likes to Flirt and Eat. Somehow this gives him the ability to bring cards back from the discard pile. Why? How does the card ability sync with the attributes of this character?

    ReplyDelete
  7. DanielSolisMarch 15, 2012 at 4:36 PM

    Wallflower is a popular choice, but the problem is that it's not a verb like the others.

    I'm curious about the mechaphors this is making, too. In the case of 6, he's a Richminster who is eating, flirting and brings back discarded cards. I'm getting images of a Henry VIII mixed with Hedonismbot.

    He's an indulgent, wealthy bon vivant who won't let people leave the party.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results that ar
Read more

The Thousand-Year Game Design Challenge

Image
UPDATE: The submission period has closed and here are the entries. If you're an entrant, continue sending pics or vids of people playing your game. The first step to a game lasting a thousand years is for people to play it today. UPDATE 2: And here's the winner! To support games designed for longevity – that can be learned, played and shared for hundreds of years – we offer this challenge to any game designers, artists and imaginative people who also share this desire. Challenge Create a game. The game can be of any theme or genre you desire, but there is one restriction: You're creating a "new classic," like Chess, Tag or card games. So, create a game to be enjoyed by generations of players for a thousand years. Prize $1,000 to the winning entrant, to be announced and awarded January 1, 2012. Entry Deadline Entries must be submitted before midnight July August 31st, 2011. ( Update ) Entry Guidelines Enter by posting a comment below with a link
Read more