Gems and Driftwood: Comparing Designer Games to Folk Games

driftwood

I learned two card games last night, both from Asia, featuring a deck of suits and ranks, but that's pretty much where the similarity ends.




Parade
...is designed by Naoki Homma and is a very clever combination of line-drafting and evasion-type trick-taking. The game features a simple deck of cards in six suits with 11 ranks each.

On your turn, you place a card from your hand at the end of the parade. The rank of the card you play represents the number of consecutive cards in the parade you may ignore, but after that point you must collect any cards of equal rank, lesser rank, or the same suit.

If you collect the most of a suit at the end of the game, you can turn those cards face-down. Score points equal to your rank, plus 1 point per face-down card. Player with fewest points wins.

It's easy to learn and interesting tactics emerge within a few turns.




Tichu
...is supposedly a folk game from China translated and popularized in Europe sometime between 1970 and 1990. If that all sounds a bit murky, it's because tracking down the lineage of Tichu is a bit difficult. BGG lists Urs Hostettler as the designer, yet all marketing materials for the game say it's played by millions of people in China. According to this thread, it's based on actual popular "climbing game" genre which include games like Mao, Zhen Shangyou, and Big Two. The Westernized version combines elements of the whole genre into a single game.

Regardless of its origins, the game is played thusly: In a standard four-player game, facing players are partners trying to get the best score together. On your turn, you play a single card, pair of identical ranks, three pairs, trio of identical ranks, full house (trio+pair), or five or more cards with a consecutive sequence of ranks. Thereafter, each player may play that same type of set, beating the value of the previously played set; or may pass instead. The game ends when one team has run out of cards or if only one player is left with cards. Score points for specific cards.

Fairly straightforward, right? But there are several idiosyncratic elements, including several special cards with unique values, triggering their own multi-step orders of operations. There are also special sets called "bombs" which will beat any trick, regardless of the current set of the trick. And there are also special bets called "Grand Tichu" and "Tichu" which are their own thing.

I've tried to learn Tichu several times, several ways, but it's only after playing four times in-person at a special teaching event that I almost got it. This got me thinking about the differences between folk games and designer games.


Folk Games
...are like driftwood. They're refined by natural forces of nature over time to become unique, lovely objects of beauty.
  • Usually passed on via oral tradition, thus no single designer credit except the occasional historical anomaly in which one person popularizes the game to mass audiences.
  • Usually very old, though with some unique exceptions in recent history.
  • That combination of age and oral tradition means there are usually numerous localized variations with small tweaks to the basic game, though at times giving the game a totally different name.
  • Generally free or very cheap, playable with ubiquitous components like dice, cards, or a ball (in the case of sports).

Designer Games
...are like gems. They're deliberately crafted by one person or a small collective. Just as beautiful, but by design.
  • Usually passed on by commercial products, in a box or book, sold in a store. These days, often also taught via video tutorials.
  • Usually very new, most having only been designed in the past 100 years. (This also contributes to our ability to identify a single designer in the first place.)
  • Though there may still very well be house rules for a designer game, there is still technically one authoritative arbiter of the game, be it the publisher or the designer.

I'm curious about your thoughts about the difference between designer games and folk games!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results that ar
Read more

The Thousand-Year Game Design Challenge

Image
UPDATE: The submission period has closed and here are the entries. If you're an entrant, continue sending pics or vids of people playing your game. The first step to a game lasting a thousand years is for people to play it today. UPDATE 2: And here's the winner! To support games designed for longevity – that can be learned, played and shared for hundreds of years – we offer this challenge to any game designers, artists and imaginative people who also share this desire. Challenge Create a game. The game can be of any theme or genre you desire, but there is one restriction: You're creating a "new classic," like Chess, Tag or card games. So, create a game to be enjoyed by generations of players for a thousand years. Prize $1,000 to the winning entrant, to be announced and awarded January 1, 2012. Entry Deadline Entries must be submitted before midnight July August 31st, 2011. ( Update ) Entry Guidelines Enter by posting a comment below with a link
Read more