Interesting Game Mechanic: Action Replacement

Red Meeple

This week, an odd little mechanic has bitten my brain hard and refuses to let go until I've got it firmly written down for posterity. Not sure where this idea will go, since it doesn't really have a theme associated with it yet, so here it is in the abstract.

Action Replacement
There are limited number of actions for you to do on your turn. In order to take one of those actions, you must replace that action with a new one, which will probably be even more useful than the one you replaced.

Here's a visual example, using some cards as the form factor, which I think would be particularly interesting for their versatility.

First, the play area begins with a set of four basic cards, each allowing you to acquire a specific type of resource.
  • In order to use one of these actions, you must "pay" a card from your hand and set it on top of the chosen action-card.
  • Then you may draw a new card from the deck at the end of your turn.
  • If you ever cause a stack to exceed four cards, you must take that stack and replace it with your new card.
Collected cards score points equal to their stars, but some cards also have other endgame scoring bonuses or penalties.

The actual wording of the card you pay doesn't matter for now. Only the card that was already face-up matters. In this case, you get 1 of the resource represented by the squiggly lines. At the end of your turn, your chosen action is replaced with your paid card, thus making a new action available to players on their next turn.

In this case, it allows a player to get 1 of the resource represented by a triangle. If that player were to pay with a green card, she would also get 1 of the resource represented by #.

On the next player's turn, he wants to get 1 of the resource represented by @, so he pays a card to do so. He replaces his chosen action with his paid card, thus making a new action available.

In this case, the new action allows a player to get 2 of the resources represented by #. If the stack of cards were three or higher, that player would also be able to draw an extra card at the end of her turn. Some cards might also refer to adjacent spaces, augmenting their potency based on those conditions, such as "If a red card is visible..."

Next turn, you want to get 1 resource represented by the triangle. The new action has an unusual effect:

Using this action allows a player to get a whopping 4 of the resource represented by # and allows her to collect this stack early. However, the endgame effect is that this card will cost its owner 1 point per # in her collection. So before the end of the game, she wants to find an outlet for # or get rid of this card from her collection.

Your opponent avoids temptation and decides to use the basic action that allows him to get 1 of the resource represented by #.

Instead of getting resources, the new action allows you to convert "@" resources to points. If an extra card is paid to do this, the exchange rate is doubled.

And that's all I've got so far. Lots of crazy emergent permutations based on a simple mechanic, but no theme as yet. I'll mull that over, but for now I'm just glad to get this out of my head for a minute. :)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results that ar
Read more

The Thousand-Year Game Design Challenge

Image
UPDATE: The submission period has closed and here are the entries. If you're an entrant, continue sending pics or vids of people playing your game. The first step to a game lasting a thousand years is for people to play it today. UPDATE 2: And here's the winner! To support games designed for longevity – that can be learned, played and shared for hundreds of years – we offer this challenge to any game designers, artists and imaginative people who also share this desire. Challenge Create a game. The game can be of any theme or genre you desire, but there is one restriction: You're creating a "new classic," like Chess, Tag or card games. So, create a game to be enjoyed by generations of players for a thousand years. Prize $1,000 to the winning entrant, to be announced and awarded January 1, 2012. Entry Deadline Entries must be submitted before midnight July August 31st, 2011. ( Update ) Entry Guidelines Enter by posting a comment below with a link
Read more