[In the Lab] 5x5

This is a post from the old blog, but I want to preserve it in the current lab. I still talk about it with Fred occasionally, so you never know when I'll pick it up again.

---

UPDATE: Fred just posted his continued thoughts of from his original inspiration post here.

---

A while back, Fred Hicks wrote up this cool idea where superpowers came from a mysterious radio signal. Certain people are "Receivers" for this signal and are regulated by the FCC.

We talked about incorporating a bit of HAM radio jargon. Specifically the phrase "5 by 5," meaning that a radio signal has perfect signal strength ("5") and perfect signal clarity("5").

The natural systemic representation for this would be a 2d6 system, wherein one die represents signal strength and the other signal clarity. "6" results would be special cases, representing some kind of critical-something-or-other.

I woke up with further thoughts on how to express this as a superpower. Of course, these re-tread some other ideas I've used in Do and Happy Birthday Robot, but I beg indulgence one more time. :P

I'm imagining Receivers as radio-powered analogues to the Marauders. Swirling balls of reality-bending chaos that must be contained or destroyed for the sake of universal coherence. With that in mind, here's my idea for how to handle radio-powers:

Step 1: Roll
On your turn, if you choose to use a radio power, first roll two six-sided dice. One die represents signal strength. One die represents signal clarity. Those designations are decided at the beginning of the game.

Step 2: Strength
You may describe some amazing feat of radio-powered reality-bending, but your description is limited. You may only describe this event in a number of words equal to your Strength die result, to a maximum of 5. (Results of "6" are discussed after these steps.)

You always have the word "I" as a free word, though. Saying "I," in your description does not count against this word limit.

For example: You rolled a "3" on your strength die. That means you could say something like the following sentences:

"I turn into fire."
"I blow freezing wind."
"I jam the signal."

Step 3: Clarity

Here's where things get tricky. Now your description will be modified based on the result on your Clarity die.
----
Oh wait, I just realized a problem here. My original idea was to make each player take turns changing one word in the description. The number of turns would be determined by the Clarity die. So if you rolled a 4, then four players would each take a turn changing one word of your description.

The idea was that radio powers are unpredictable and dangerous, sometimes causing unintended events.

But that doesn't fit the "5 by 5" theme if a higher number is supposed to be a clearer signal. Oh well, you see where I was going with it. :P

Oh yeah, and the idea for 6s is that they give you "Amps," You can put an amp on a word in your description so that it may not be changed.

Comments

  1. John HarperNovember 23, 2010 at 9:52 PM

    I love that idea of powers as a radio signal. And 5x5 is such a cool name.

    Want to steal! ^_^

    ReplyDelete
  2. Daniel SolisNovember 23, 2010 at 10:56 PM

    You have enough to work on! But I'm happy to discuss ideas. :D

    ReplyDelete
  3. JaredNovember 24, 2010 at 11:00 AM

    I really like this. It's got my imagination firing.

    What if the clarity die defined the weakness of the superpowers? That way if you get a 1, your weakness is remarkably general: "wood," "yellow," etc. A roll of five gives you a very specific weakness "wooden baseball bat from 1964" or "drenched in ice-cold lemonade"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Brennan TaylorNovember 24, 2010 at 11:06 AM

    Here's how to fix clarity: Each player has 5 word change opportunities by default, but this is reduced by 1 for each point of clarity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Daniel SolisNovember 24, 2010 at 11:41 AM

    You guys both have interesting takes on the clarity issue. One addresses the fiction and the other addresses the numbers. Not sure where to take this next, but I'd love to find a middle ground between the two.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jonathan C. DietrichNovember 24, 2010 at 8:51 PM

    Something else to consider is that the opposite of clarity is noise. So instead of changing, the other players could ADD words to your statement, thus garbling the message, and mutating your intent.

    If you want the second die to remain as "CLARITY" then the number of new words to add to your statement of intent is five minus the number on your "clarity" die. (as Brennan mentioned)

    The other way you could go, would be to name the second die "NOISE" and then you could just read the number off (but then you could never have a noise-less invocation, there would always be a minimum amount of static, and you don't really have the pure 5x5 coolness)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Daniel SolisNovember 25, 2010 at 7:07 AM

    Yeah, I considered that, too. On the one hand, I dislike subtraction in a game mechanic. On the other hand, I don't want to lose the mechaphor. It could simply be a thing where Strength is the size of a dice pool and Clarity is the target number.

    ReplyDelete
  8. BrennanMay 8, 2011 at 9:19 AM

    Here's how to fix clarity: Each player has 5 word change opportunities by default, but this is reduced by 1 for each point of clarity.

    ReplyDelete
  9. JaredMay 8, 2011 at 9:19 AM

    I really like this. It's got my imagination firing.

    What if the clarity die defined the weakness of the superpowers? That way if you get a 1, your weakness is remarkably general: "wood," "yellow," etc. A roll of five gives you a very specific weakness "wooden baseball bat from 1964" or "drenched in ice-cold lemonade"

    ReplyDelete
  10. gremlinlegionsAugust 29, 2011 at 4:58 PM

    Hey, have you done any more tinkering with this? After playing more DO and HBR, the 5x5 concept has been itching at my brain. Would it be okay if I toyed around with a few ideas?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Daniel SolisAugust 29, 2011 at 10:17 PM

    Go right ahead! I haven't really taken it anywhere since this post.

    ReplyDelete
  12. gremlinlegionsAugust 30, 2011 at 10:14 AM

    Awesome. I'll try to get my notes organized a bit, and I'll probably post the ideas on StoryGames later today.
    ...such is the danger of me working overtime, and having nothing better to do while waiting for the printers to finish their runs.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has...
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results tha...
Read more

One Thing to Avoid in Game Design

Image
When game designer Paul Peterson was interviewed for the upcoming Titans Series of games from Calliope Games, there was one segment at 1:55 that really caught my attention (emphasis mine): "A couple years ago I was teaching people how to play Guillotine and I hadn't played in a while. The first thing I did was say, 'The first thing you gonna do when you open your game is you look through this deck and you take this card.' I pulled out the Callous Guards card and threw it over my shoulder. Everybody laughed. I said, ' That's the biggest mistake I ever made as a game designer in my life.'" Oof. Those are strong words. What's the big deal? For context, the game Guillotine is all about collecting the heads of French nobles during the revolution. There is only one guillotine, with a line of nobles waiting for their grim fate. On your turn, you play action cards to change the order of the line, then take the Noble card from the front of the ...
Read more