Undercoding and Overcoding Your Game's Visual Language


Yesterday I wrote a long post on the value and methods of double- or triple-coding your game's visual language. Now here are some pitfalls to watch out for, using some real world examples.

Above is an example of undercoding. Apples to Apples uses only two types of cards in play, each one is a different color: Green and red. Like apples, get it? Makes sense for the theme, but it's also the most common type of color blindness. Take a look at the same image on the right and see if you could distinguish the types of cards at a glance.

Solutions: These cards could have been doublecoded by using a unique illustration for each deck or rotating the layout on one of the decks so it's horizontal.


And here's an example of overcoding. Megan and I really tried to learn Race for the Galaxy from the rules document. We eventually figured out how to make it through a few sessions, but each time we spent a lot of energy just deciphering the numerous symbols and icons. In the end, we spent more time learning the game than actually playing it, which is a shame because I know a lot of folks who swear by RftG.

Solutions: Hard to say, really. There is a LOT of information to get across on a tiny card, so simply writing it all out in plain language may not be efficient. Still, constantly referencing the visual glossary is a huge stumbling block to fluent play. If I were designing Race for the Galaxy from scratch, using all the same rules, I'd probably make it a big box board game. Freed from the constraints of a deck of cards, we could use a board, tokens, pawns, trackers and other implements to help make the learning curve a bit more shallow.

That brings up a final point. Doublecoding can't solve everything. If your game is so complex that it requires a vast visual language, look at the game's design first and see if it needs to be playtested more. If you're satisfied by the game's rules and still need that large language, then look at other format for your game. You may be surprised to find that you're actually making a video game!

Next, I'll talk about how I used coding in Belle of the Ball, taking lessons from all examples.

Comments

  1. Daniel LoftonMarch 23, 2011 at 9:58 PM

    I (and Sage) had the same experience trying to learn Race for the Galaxy. The cards for SageFight are much easier to understand.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Daniel SolisMarch 24, 2011 at 8:31 AM

    Funny that you should mention SageFight cards. That's exactly the format I was considering as a low-end alternative to the t-shirts. I could see them laminated with a lanyard like a convention badge.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownMarch 24, 2011 at 8:42 AM

    I'm colour-blind (or visually impaired, if you will) and I've got no trouble distinguishing the green and red cards.

    Note how they've picked a light shade for the green, a darker one for the red. Easy to distinguish.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Daniel SolisMarch 26, 2011 at 8:20 AM

    Nice! Good to know that was considered at least.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousMarch 29, 2011 at 12:35 PM

    While I agree with your general point of how difficult it can be to learn the icons of Race for the Galaxy, part of the problem is how they are conveyed to new players. Each icon is treated as it’s own thing, but there are a handful of recurring elements in the icons and, if they had explained those elements, learning all of the icons would much easier.

    For instance, any time you see a hand grasping a rectangle with rounded corners it means a card in hand. If it has a +1 it means draw a card into your hand (increase the number of cards in hand by 1) if it’s Xed out it means discard a card. If a miniature version of an element like card in hand appears to the top-right of another element, the large element triggers the action of the smaller element, as in Public Works develop power or Gem World’s Produce power. Likewise, each of the phase symbols (like the orange diamond for develop and the with circle with the black and red border for Settle) recur in power icons.

    So Lehmann, Huang and Tummelson focused on teaching the words rather than the alphabet, making the icons seem much more complex than they actually are.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Daniel SolisMarch 29, 2011 at 1:08 PM

    Wow, I think you've managed to make those icons make a lot more sense to me. I dunno if I can convince my wife to give it another shot, but I'd like to play it again with someone who is more fluent.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousMarch 29, 2011 at 2:02 PM

    Glad I could help :)

    Maybe we should collaborate (I could use your graphic skills) on a guide to the RftG icon alphabet.

    ReplyDelete
  8. linnaeusMay 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM

    Glad I could help :)

    Maybe we should collaborate (I could use your graphic skills) on a guide to the RftG icon alphabet.

    ReplyDelete
  9. GrahamMay 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM

    I'm colour-blind (or visually impaired, if you will) and I've got no trouble distinguishing the green and red cards.

    Note how they've picked a light shade for the green, a darker one for the red. Easy to distinguish.

    ReplyDelete
  10. danoheadMay 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM

    I (and Sage) had the same experience trying to learn Race for the Galaxy. The cards for SageFight are much easier to understand.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results that ar
Read more

The Thousand-Year Game Design Challenge

Image
UPDATE: The submission period has closed and here are the entries. If you're an entrant, continue sending pics or vids of people playing your game. The first step to a game lasting a thousand years is for people to play it today. UPDATE 2: And here's the winner! To support games designed for longevity – that can be learned, played and shared for hundreds of years – we offer this challenge to any game designers, artists and imaginative people who also share this desire. Challenge Create a game. The game can be of any theme or genre you desire, but there is one restriction: You're creating a "new classic," like Chess, Tag or card games. So, create a game to be enjoyed by generations of players for a thousand years. Prize $1,000 to the winning entrant, to be announced and awarded January 1, 2012. Entry Deadline Entries must be submitted before midnight July August 31st, 2011. ( Update ) Entry Guidelines Enter by posting a comment below with a link
Read more