[In the Lab] A Situation for Rulers - Hunger Game of Thrones?


So the big problem with the Rulers universe is that it's a potent setting, but hard to come up with a crystal-clear scenario that creates focused play and touches on all the cool aspects of the setting. I call this the Shadowrun problem. So much of Shadowrun's awesome comes from the melange of fantasy and cyberpunk, yet the focus of play is on a teeny, tiny aspect of the universe: dungeon-crawling.

Folks on Story-Games came up with a lot of interesting scenarios. I eventually settled on a Prince Zuko scenario: Royal exiles in the DMZ. The king's sons and daughters are suddenly exiled, cut off from the line of succession, and cast out into the unruled zone between kingdoms.

That's fine, but it still doesn't give characters a real purpose. I like it when there's one thing everyone knows they're supposed to be doing, even if the story deviates from that over time. There's still a central lane players know they're supposed to walk. (For example: Pilgrims help people and get into trouble.)

So, I'm considering an extra wrinkle in the basic exile scenario: It's televised. The whole exile scenario is like a Rumpsringa. Royal exiles proving their worth individually while being forced to stick together by external pressures.

Mechanically, you could pull stuff from the "First Contact" scenario of Split Decision, where optimal actions could negatively impact public approval and vice versa. Minor betryals might get a pass once or twice, but a fickle audience will only put up with so much.

I suppose I should just get down to writing this thing into a playable beta at some point, eh?

Comments

  1. Rob DonoghueJanuary 30, 2012 at 10:31 AM

    So, you have this fantastic externally facing structure, but I think part of the formlessness your encountering is that there's no internal traction. That is to say, there is no window into what it is rulers want.

    The trick is that, outside of cartoons, no one just wants power. There is _something_ they really believe in which is usually tightly tied to themself. That is to say, the tyrant wants power to rule, but he also sees himself as the BEST POSSIBLE PERSON for the job. Yes, there's an element of self delusion to that, but it's a critically important element of self delusion for those who really pursue power. Whatever self-serving lens they put it through, winners perceive that they do it in service of _something_ , be it God or the good of their nation, tribe, people, family or other group they identify with.

    (Yes, you do have the occasional one who wants power because they deserve or are entitled to it, but such individuals usually represent the end of a dynasty, since those are the ones who get knocked off their thrones by someone with more will to power.)

    All of which is to say that so far you have a neat model for power without agenda, but that's a recipe for frustration, and the reality TV idea points to the why of it. See, it's a really fun, playable idea - royalty in exile scoring points on each other on reality TV? Totally gameable. But it could just as easily be the kids of a billionaire or similar - it doesn't speak to the much more interesting premise of rules and laws that you've laid down.

    ReplyDelete
  2. DanielSolisJanuary 30, 2012 at 10:45 AM

    Hm! I like mechanizing those kinds of internal motivations, even if only a little bit. Any thoughts on how to make those motivations mechanically relevant? Aspects? Do-style Banner/Avatar?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rob DonoghueJanuary 30, 2012 at 11:54 AM

    That is a huge question, bigger than can probably be answered all at once, but I think the important thing is that the question is raised more than the specific implementation.

    To raise an example, consider if each character must answer the question of where there authority comes from in their own mind - by what right do they rule?

    There are a few categories of answers, all potentially fruitful for mechanical hooks, but they are mostly either internal or external.

    External reasons would be things like ruling by right of law (I'm the firstborn!) or because it's the Will of God. Both of these are powerful reasons, but it also intrinsically ties a character to the structures they suggest. If a king rules by divine right then turns his back on the church or the evident will of God (think Saul or Henry VIII) they undermine their own power.

    Internal reasons tend to be "Because I am..." and can be things like "The strongest", "Well loved" and so on, and they in turn raise questions when the character's primacy in that sphere is challenged. If you deserve to rule because you're the strongest, how do you respond to someone who might be stronger?

    This challenge to the internal pillar of authority is a huge driver in fiction, and if hooked into power, could also probably drive play.

    -Rob D.

    PS - Oh, one other thought - consider the change between "Rules originate from rulers" and "Rules exist and can be shaped by rulers". Doesn't change how things much under an active ruler, but it does allow old rules to linger on based ont heir own strength, which in turn provides the necessary seeds for conflict and dissent.

    It also raises an interesting resonance between rules and laws, since if rules exist (like laws) then the difference between rule and law becomes more meaty, summed up in the simple sentiment that a law is a rule that hasn't been broken _yet_.

    (also allows for the critically important differing rules to exist, allowing factionalism, which is somewhat critical to this kind of flavor, since you may use one set of rules to protect yourself from another, forcing conflict or compromise - consider church vs. civil law as a mundane example of this).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mick BradleyJanuary 30, 2012 at 2:46 PM

    Daniel's brilliance enhanced and spiced with Rob's brilliance? Yeah, this needed to happen a long time ago. Make this game, please.

    ReplyDelete
  5. DanielSolisJanuary 30, 2012 at 3:07 PM

    Man, like I need another game on my plate. :P Oh well, I've probably written enough content to flesh out a small setting document anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Paul WeimerJanuary 31, 2012 at 11:42 AM

    Also, Power is usually a means to an end. I want power to make "x" happen. X is the motivation and the key to personality.

    I want to be Queen so I can restore my mother's homelands back into the fold of the Empire as they should be.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has...
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results tha...
Read more

One Thing to Avoid in Game Design

Image
When game designer Paul Peterson was interviewed for the upcoming Titans Series of games from Calliope Games, there was one segment at 1:55 that really caught my attention (emphasis mine): "A couple years ago I was teaching people how to play Guillotine and I hadn't played in a while. The first thing I did was say, 'The first thing you gonna do when you open your game is you look through this deck and you take this card.' I pulled out the Callous Guards card and threw it over my shoulder. Everybody laughed. I said, ' That's the biggest mistake I ever made as a game designer in my life.'" Oof. Those are strong words. What's the big deal? For context, the game Guillotine is all about collecting the heads of French nobles during the revolution. There is only one guillotine, with a line of nobles waiting for their grim fate. On your turn, you play action cards to change the order of the line, then take the Noble card from the front of the ...
Read more