Take-Back-Toe Wins the Thousand-Year Game Design Challenge



The winner of the Thousand-Year Game Design Challenge is Take-Back-Toe by James Ernest. It was a close, close decision. All the finalists had unique attributes that made them stand out from the rest. Whether it be sustainability, accessibility, strong community, and just straight elegance, each entry had strong showings in one category or another.

Still, we found the strongest overlapping approval for Take-Back-Toe, a well-rounded abstract with a touch of randomness. We found it intriguing that the game can be played with any forty objects and no board. That mix of specificity and generality is a clever avenue for the game to survive generations as either a commoners' game (with seeds in pits) or an elite past-time (with specially crafted components). It makes the game very portable, too. While waiting in line at an author signing, a friend wanted to learn how to play. A minute later, we ripped up a sheet of paper and played on the floor. I've played with stones (as seen above), cards, and poker chips. It's a hit every time. We replayed this game more often than any entry in the lineup.

Congratulations to James Ernest!

And a thousand thanks to everyone who entered the Challenge – for your entry and for your patience during the long judging period. We're still just a couple of gamers and this is only our best guess at what will survive into distant future. All of the finalists have a great shot at becoming a thousand-year game. I do hope you all continue designing new games into the new year and beyond.

As for the future of the Challenge itself? Well, I'm taking a personal break. I hope the Challenge returns in the future with a larger judging committee. With luck, the Challenge can live on well beyond my stewardship.

And who knows? A Challenge entrant may actually last to the next millennium!

Comments

  1. Nick BentleyJanuary 1, 2012 at 3:46 PM

    Hard to argue with the choice. I'm trying to get my SO to play it with me today. Congrats to the indomitable James Ernest [goes back to playing The Big Idea]! And big thanks to you Daniel for creating the design contest of my dreams and administering it so well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Luis BolañosJanuary 3, 2012 at 12:51 AM

    Congrats to James Ernest for winning the Challenge!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Marcos DJanuary 3, 2012 at 10:42 AM

    Congratulations James!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Derek HohlsMay 9, 2012 at 8:32 AM

    Pity that this contest was won by a professional (in the sense of already having had games published) designer. Perhaps next time the contest will be made open to "first timers"?

    ReplyDelete
  5. DanielSolisMay 9, 2012 at 8:47 AM

    Check out the finalists for some exciting new-ish designers. http://danielsolisblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/finalists-of-thousand-year-game-design.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has...
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results tha...
Read more

One Thing to Avoid in Game Design

Image
When game designer Paul Peterson was interviewed for the upcoming Titans Series of games from Calliope Games, there was one segment at 1:55 that really caught my attention (emphasis mine): "A couple years ago I was teaching people how to play Guillotine and I hadn't played in a while. The first thing I did was say, 'The first thing you gonna do when you open your game is you look through this deck and you take this card.' I pulled out the Callous Guards card and threw it over my shoulder. Everybody laughed. I said, ' That's the biggest mistake I ever made as a game designer in my life.'" Oof. Those are strong words. What's the big deal? For context, the game Guillotine is all about collecting the heads of French nobles during the revolution. There is only one guillotine, with a line of nobles waiting for their grim fate. On your turn, you play action cards to change the order of the line, then take the Noble card from the front of the ...
Read more