[Do] The Grid of Caring


Mark Sherry and I were talking about destiny in Do: Pilgrims of the Flying Temple. In this conversation, he made some big observations, which I'll condense below. He begins...

"There are two ways to view the Destiny mechanic in Do. The first is the way that you seem to view it: you have a desired outcome for your character, and it might lead you to make suboptimal choices in choosing stones in order to obtain it. The way I viewed it was that your Destiny was an emergent detail, informing you of your character's ultimate fate as an outcome of the (sometimes hard) choices you made earlier."

To which I reply, "And you really can play it both ways. My preference is the former, but you can easily play in-the-moment and still get an interesting ending for your character."

Mark continues, "The latter is how I tended to play, and analyzed the game. I want to be surprised by the ending.

"Part of it is that that I didn't find that the things that Destiny modified really affected how I played. Having a different banner or avatar wouldn't have influenced which set of stones I chose, so having Destiny modify one of them at the end of the round was viewed as more of a flavour customization matter, making it easier for me to tell a story, but easier to get a happy ending, or a desired Final Destiny. Similarly, Final Destiny affects nothing, since it's explicitly the end of the game."

"Metaphor hit!" I interrupt. "The journey is more important than the destination."

Mark continues, unfazed. "There's a 2x2 grid of caring. Care or not care about destiny; and care or not care about parades/pitchforks.

"If you care only about destiny, or care about destiny more than parades/pitchforks, there's no more game. Just pick the appropriately coloured stones each time and you can't lose. The danger is that other people in your group care about parades/pitchfork since you're sabotaging the group's goal for your private goal.

"If you care only about parades/pitchfork, the game has challenge, and destiny outcomes are just interesting results/obstacles to make your game more interesting.

"If you don't care about either, why the hell are you playing?

"If you care about both, then the game is even more challenging. Your goal is probably to get as close to a parades ending as possible before focusing on destiny, hoping you can then get enough stones of the right types to satisfy both goals."

Yup, that's a very good summary of Do's gameplay. Beneath all the silly troublemaking and whatnot, there are some basic motive-engines that drive the game towards some kind of endpoint. The flavor of which depends on your whims and their interaction with the other players' whims.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results that ar
Read more

The Thousand-Year Game Design Challenge

Image
UPDATE: The submission period has closed and here are the entries. If you're an entrant, continue sending pics or vids of people playing your game. The first step to a game lasting a thousand years is for people to play it today. UPDATE 2: And here's the winner! To support games designed for longevity – that can be learned, played and shared for hundreds of years – we offer this challenge to any game designers, artists and imaginative people who also share this desire. Challenge Create a game. The game can be of any theme or genre you desire, but there is one restriction: You're creating a "new classic," like Chess, Tag or card games. So, create a game to be enjoyed by generations of players for a thousand years. Prize $1,000 to the winning entrant, to be announced and awarded January 1, 2012. Entry Deadline Entries must be submitted before midnight July August 31st, 2011. ( Update ) Entry Guidelines Enter by posting a comment below with a link
Read more