Workification


We're hearing a lot about gamification over the past few years. Whether for or against, I can't help but feel like there's a nuanced middle-ground. It's just another method of communication, administration or education that can be implemented carelessly or thoughtfully. When done carelessly, it feels like Tom Sawyer convincing Huck to paint a fence. An insincere ruse, y'know?

That's pretty much my only statement on the matter for now, but I was curious what the opposite of gamification would be. Workification? How would you define it? I posed this question to my tweeps. Here are there responses:

@DanielSolis game mechanics that are so heavy and/or require you to do something too similar to actual work? #madethisupless than a minute ago via TweetDeck Favorite Retweet ReplyRenato Ramonda
renatoram


@DanielSolis Halo 3 on Legendary. Achievements that require grinding up to a huge number. Shadowrun character creation.less than a minute ago via Twitter for Mac Favorite Retweet ReplyKit
kobutsu


@DanielSolis Applying work processes - like paperwork and accounting and inventory management - to games, to make them less engaging.less than a minute ago via web Favorite Retweet ReplyCraig Wayling
luminoustedium


@DanielSolis Turning play into an obligation. Professional gambling, pro sports, most MMORPGs' griding after the initial fun bits, etc.less than a minute ago via Tweetie for Mac Favorite Retweet ReplyMarc Majcher
majcher


@DanielSolis Gamification adds rewards. Workification avoids rewards.less than a minute ago via web Favorite Retweet ReplyChris Chinn
yeloson



» Image: Attribution Non-commercial Share-Alike license by sAeroZar

Comments

  1. kenkinsMay 10, 2011 at 3:09 AM

    I'm surprised how most of those definitions are negative or, at best, neutral. That "work" is a pejorative is one of the things that gamification attempts to address.

    So turning that around and addressing the pejorative of "game", how about: "Applying productivity to leisure or passive activities."

    This seems like a challenge that parents constantly face.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pete DarbyMay 10, 2011 at 4:16 AM

    The X beyond the Frontier games (and to an extent trader campaigns in Traveller that inspired them), LOTS of European heavy strategy PC games, the mid-late game of civilization... yeah, lots of times when I've stopped and thought "You know what, I've paid for this and it should be the other way around, screw this".

    Where this is negative is where "work" is divorced from "craft", the idea of effort invested to produce something worthwhile, even if that thing is the experience of investing focussed, skilled effort.

    WHich I'm guessing is the point at which gamification and workification hit a sweet spot.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pete DarbyMay 10, 2011 at 4:17 AM

    Oh yeah, bad workification: 90% of the facebook social games I've seen. "Click here 900 times, share with your friends, get a cruddy bitmap on your profile, WIN!"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ari BancaleMay 10, 2011 at 10:43 AM

    I find workification a funny word! I was laughing hard at the initial responses. I totally agree with both kenkins and Pete regarding the negatives and positives balancing out.

    The grind in games make it work. Profit from virtual gold farming also make it work.

    On a positive note, I've used spreadsheets when playing EVE online. Calculators have been coded for casual games such as Caesary. A custom card designer is available for Elements The Game. These are just a few examples of game workification, which I believe serve to enrich the gaming experience.

    Gamification aims to enrich Real Life by using game dynamics and fun to engage its unmotivated players. The sweet spot is @avantgame winning the Nobel Peace Price.

    ReplyDelete
  5. HammerlilyMay 13, 2011 at 12:44 PM

    Workification would involve producing something that is a real world product or result.

    ReplyDelete
  6. HammerlilyMay 13, 2011 at 12:47 PM

    It would be awesome to find a game... that had been subjected to workification that resulted in a producing a real world product or result... like that the is supposed to come from work. How fun would that be!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Daniel SolisMay 13, 2011 at 6:07 PM

    There are a couple experiments with that, like the games where you help bio-labs by playing a puzzle game where you put together protein chains. I can't recall the results of that experiment, but it was a cool idea.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Daniel SolisMay 13, 2011 at 6:08 PM

    I guess the real difference is whether it's work you're doing in the service of something you enjoy already.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Graphic Design and Typography Tips for your Card Game

Image
Chris Farrell of Illuminating Games just wrote a thorough critique of card games setting their body text to be so small that they cannot be read at arm's length, let alone across the table. Here's an excerpt, but the whole thing is worth a read for any would-be card game designers out there. (Myself included.) Break out your copy of the base set of Dominion, and look at the Chapel. This has a text box roughly 3.5cm by 4.5cm. It's got a single line of text. That line of text is 1 (one) millimeter high. 1mm! For me, it's only clearly readable at half an arm's length even in the bright light of day. (...) Compare this to a more sane game like Glory to Rome, where the font size is 2-3 times as large (text is 2mm high, keywords 3mm and usually highlighted). I can generally read Glory to Rome cards across the table, and can certainly see the important keywords. To heap insult upon injury, not only does Glory to Rome have far more legible text than Dominion it also has...
Read more

Low-High Dice Game

Image
A dice game inspired by the stock market (and playing lots of Martian Dice). Roll a bunch of dice and choose which sets to keep. Choose your strategy wisely! Stuff You Need Two-to-Six PLAYERS A PENCIL and PAPER to keep score Thirteen standard six-sided DICE How to Play The shortest player takes the first turn. On your turn, first roll all thirteen dice. Several dice will have matching results. These are called SETS. (A single die result is a set, too.) You must choose a set to keep. For example, your first roll results are 111124445555 . The sets are four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, and four 5 s. After keeping a set of dice, lock them up in a row. This is called the GOOD TRACK. For example,  you could keep the set of four 1 s, one 2 , three 4 s, or four 5 s . You decide to keep the four 1 s and line them up in your good track. After keeping a set, you may end your turn or re-roll the remaining unlocked dice. When you re-roll, immediately set aside any results tha...
Read more

One Thing to Avoid in Game Design

Image
When game designer Paul Peterson was interviewed for the upcoming Titans Series of games from Calliope Games, there was one segment at 1:55 that really caught my attention (emphasis mine): "A couple years ago I was teaching people how to play Guillotine and I hadn't played in a while. The first thing I did was say, 'The first thing you gonna do when you open your game is you look through this deck and you take this card.' I pulled out the Callous Guards card and threw it over my shoulder. Everybody laughed. I said, ' That's the biggest mistake I ever made as a game designer in my life.'" Oof. Those are strong words. What's the big deal? For context, the game Guillotine is all about collecting the heads of French nobles during the revolution. There is only one guillotine, with a line of nobles waiting for their grim fate. On your turn, you play action cards to change the order of the line, then take the Noble card from the front of the ...
Read more